Tuesday, May 5, 2020

Sustainable Management Strategy for Prophylactic Proficiency

Question: Discuss about theSustainable Management Strategy for Prophylactic Proficiency. Answer: Introduction The core agenda projected for 2030 are based on sustainable development and management strategies which aim generally at securing a sustainable, equitable, successful and peaceful life on the world for each and every one at all time and moments, all this is believed to be achievable through integration of information and communication (ICT) in courses to be offered and learned by students in worldwide colleges and universities. The integration of information and communication in learning institutions is believed to enhance knowledge to the students through sharing, discussing and acquiring more contents from their other colleagues and lecturers in different institutions worldwide and also to easy their learning by not specifically going to classes, since learning may even proceed when they are in their respective homes or rooms, through interconnection of their laptops or desktop either by fiber optics or student hub, with each and every lectures from their teaching point. The achievement of this integration of information and communication technology in any institution, in carrying out all activities will enhance a better sustainable management strategy that will help the institution achieve its policy objectives. Technical solutions involving integration of sustainability Systems thinking proficiency For system thinking competency one will have aptitudes of recognizing and understanding the relationships on analyzing more complex systems; to be able to know the insertion of systems in several domains and diverse scales and also be able to cope up with uncertainty. Prophylactic proficiency For anticipatory proficiency one will be able to understand and estimate numerous features as possible, credible and desirable; will be able to create his or her personal visions aiming at the future, will be able to apply a cautionary standard, will be able to evaluate the significances of each action; and will be able to cope up with hazards and modifications. Normative proficiency For normative proficiency one will be able to have the competence to comprehend and replicate on the customs and principles that motivate ones activities and be able to implement sustainability standards, ideologies, goals, and objectives, in a perspective of uncertain knowledge and ambiguities. Strategic proficiency For strategic proficiency one will be able to have the competence for mutual development and implementation of the innovative actions on advance sustainability at all stages. Collaboration proficiency For collaboration proficiency one will be able to have the ability to learn from each other, to comprehend and respect the essentials, empathy, to understand, have empathic governance, to solve conflicts that may arise in groups, and also be able to have a facilitation for solving the collaborative and the participatory problem. Integrated problem-solving proficiency For integrated problem solving proficiency one will have the competence in applying diverse framework technique on solving multifaceted sustainability problems and be able to develop feasible, comprehensive and reasonable solution possibilities that will stimulate sustainable development and incorporating all competences that will be required. Relevant environmental or sustainability legislation, regulations and codes of practice The maturity the Act public sector (ACTPs) on its implementation expects employees, administrators and managers to adhere to the Standards and moral behaviors as stipulated in the ACTPS code of conduct. The ACTPS is inconsistent in all the categories that will include executive cohort. The inconsistency is limited to the awareness of: The outfits that are available and capable of dealing with inappropriate workstation conduct. The objectives and ideologies of all the protocol structure of work. How processes will occur under all protocol structure of work. Mainly, there will be discrepancies around by what method the implements will be provided and illustrated to administrators as practical initiatives that will enhance the capacity to cope up with issues of behavioral in workstation. Estimate potential energy savings and payback for student hub Caf` The estimate of an existing cafe electrical efficiency of 15 kW, but an old model cafe is estimated to have 25 kW and its cost is $150 in addition to trade-in. Assuming construction of 180 annual cafe, the newer caf would consume 7.2 kW (= 180/25) of electricity versus 12 kW (= 180/15) for existing cafe. At consumption cost of $50.00 per Kw, and for the extra 4.8 kW conserved will be equal to $240 annually. Therefore the payback period will be equal to 0.625 years (= $150/$240). But, at increased electrical costs of a $4.00 per kW, then the payback will be equal to 0.579 years (=$150/$259.2). Audio-visual lounges An audio-visual lounge is expected to work on a maximum of ten hours per week, while a new audio-visual lounge is expected to save at least one kWh of energy occurring at each hour of its operation that means it will save 10 kWh per week or an equivalence of 520 kWh annually. If we assume electricity will costs $0.10 per every kWh, then the annual cost that will be saved will be equal to $52. If the cost for fixing 10 audio-visual lounge is approximately $1,000 on average, then the payback will be equivalent to 19.2 years, that is (= $1,000/$52). Internet corner Initial cost for internet facility is projected to be equivalent to $400, while the annual electrical energy that is saved is projected to be equivalence to $2,000. Then the payback period will be equal 0.2 years that is (= $400/$2,000) and the savings on the first year will be equal to $1,600 and $2,000 in the second year. Hence the estimated for the internet project will be 2 years, and its return on investment will be equivalent to $3,600 over two years. Equity and diversity principles and OHS safety The integrated information technology that will be implemented will be able to conventionalize on healthiness, sanitation and safety and can analytically check on them by inclusion and understanding the significance of gender. The integrated information technology will be able to conceptualize on the student to understand most chronic communicable and non-communicable diseases, and also understand the susceptible crowds and areas regarding the infection, ailment and premature death. The ICT will enable one understands the both the social, or political, or economical dimensions on health and safety. The ICT will enable one comprehends the significance of mental health.. The ICT will enable one comprehend on appropriate prevention approaches to substitute it with a positive physical and mental health and safety Reference Aguilera, R. J. (2003). The cross national diversity of corporate governance: Dimensions and determinants. Acad. Khanna, T.; Kogan, J.; Palepu, K. Globalization and dissimilarities in corporate governance: A cross-countryanalysis. Rev. Econ. Stat. 2006, 88, 6990. Yoshikawa, T.; Rasheed, A.A. Convergence of corporate governance: Critical review and future directions.Corp. Gov. 2009, 17, 388404. [CrossRef] Lazarides, T.; Drimpetas, E. Corporate governance regulatory convergence: A remedy for the wrong problem.Int. J. Law Manag. 2010, 52, 182192. [CrossRef] Politis, J. Convergence of Corporate Governance in a Globalised World: The Case of the BRICs. In Proceedings of the 8th European Conference on Management, Leadership and Governance, Pafos, Cyprus, 89 November 2012; Academic Publishing International Limited: Reading, UK, 2012; pp. 380389. Clarke, T. The continuing diversity of corporate governance: Theories of convergence and variety. Ephemera 2016, 16, 1952. UN Global Compact. Guide to Corporate Sustainability; UN Global Compact: New York, NY, USA, 2015. International Labour Organization. Tripartite Declaration of Principles Concerning Multinational Enterprises and Social Policy (MNE Declaration), 4th ed.; ILO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2014. The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. G20/OECD Principles of Corporate Governance; OECD Publishing: Paris, France, 2015. International Organization for Standardization. ISO 26000 Guidance on Social Responsibility; ISO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2010. European Commission. The EU Corporate Governance Framework; COM(2011) 164 Final, Green Paper; European Commission: Brussels, Belgium, 2011.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.